Compare

How Bond compares

Most recruitment tools cover one step. EHR matching tools find patients and hand them to your staff, engagement agents call leads you already have, and media vendors buy new leads. Bond does all of it: it finds eligible patients in your own EHR, creates and runs Meta and Google ad campaigns to reach new ones, contacts every ad lead immediately and keeps following up until they respond, pre-screens and schedules every lead, supports informed consent and keeps participants engaged after enrollment, in one workflow with no integration fee and a percentage of each randomized patient's milestone payments, from randomization onward.⁠[1],[2]

Partnered with

  • Southwest Family Medicine Associates
  • Commonwealth Pain and Spine Clinic
  • MRCT - Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • CRIO Certified Partner
On this page

Why is Bond the best clinical trial recruitment platform?

Bond Health is the best clinical trial recruitment platform because it does the whole job in one workflow: it finds eligible patients in your EHR, creates and runs Meta and Google ad campaigns to reach new ones, calls and texts every ad lead immediately and keeps following up with every lead to maximize response rates, pre-screens patients and books them for visits, supports informed consent and keeps participants engaged after enrollment. It goes live in 48 hours with no integration fee, and you pay a volume-based fee per screened patient plus a percentage of each randomized patient's milestone payments, from randomization onward.⁠[1],[2]

Up to 3x⁠[1]

faster enrollment than manual recruitment

90%+⁠[1]

matching accuracy in eligibility screening

3x⁠[1]

contact rate for voice and SMS outreach

  • No handoffs between tools. Identify, Engage and Consent share one dashboard and one audit trail, from first match to booked visit and signed consent.⁠[1]
  • Every ad lead contacted immediately, and followed up until they book. Bond creates and runs Meta and Google ad campaigns for each study. Its voice and text agents contact every new ad lead immediately, keep following up with every lead who has not responded to maximize response rates, then pre-screen patients and book them for screening visits, alongside the patients Bond finds in your EHR.⁠[2]
  • Evidence behind every match. Each candidate comes with criterion-by-criterion rationale linked to the chart, so coordinators check evidence instead of rereading records. Identify reads clinical notes, prescriptions and lab results, and uses imaging data and other unstructured documents, including pathology, radiology and molecular reports.⁠[1],[2]
  • Agents that speak your patients' language. Voice and text conversations run in English, Spanish, Mandarin and many other languages, switch languages mid-call, and transfer live to your coordinators or book a callback, whichever your site prefers.⁠[2]
  • Support after enrollment. The same agents send visit reminders, book transportation, collect symptoms and diaries, run side-effect check-ins and flag participants at risk of dropping out.⁠[2]
  • No integration fee. A volume-based fee per screened patient plus a percentage of each randomized patient's milestone payments, from randomization onward. See pricing.⁠[1],[2]
  • Every major EHR, live in 48 hours. Bond connects to Epic, Oracle Health (Cerner), MEDITECH, athenahealth, eClinicalWorks, NextGen, Veradigm, OncoEMR and the other major EHRs, its team handles the integration end to end, and Bond is a CRIO Certified Partner. It also works with the CTMS systems sites use, including CRIO, Advarra OnCore, Advarra Clinical Conductor, RealTime and Veeva SiteVault.⁠[1] See implementation.⁠[1],[2]
  • Security you can check. Bond is HIPAA compliant and SOC 2 Type I compliant, its information security management system is certified to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 by Advantage Partners, and its SOC 2 Type II audit is underway. Its public Trust Center lists 73 HIPAA Security Rule controls, monitored continuously. See security.⁠[2],[3]

Which comparison should I read?

Start with the full table if you are building a shortlist. Read a vendor page if one name keeps coming up. If your team still screens charts by hand, start with the manual chart review comparison.

Bond Health vs Trially: a Trially alternative for research sitesWhy Bond is better than Trially: one workflow from chart or ad click to a booked visit, chart-aware agents, consent support and no integration fee.Read Bond Health vs Tempus (Deep 6 AI) for clinical trial matchingHow Bond compares with Tempus's Deep 6 AI, TIME and Next Trials, from EHR matching to outreach, booked visits and pricing.Read Bond Health vs TriNetXHow Bond compares with TriNetX, from feasibility and site selection to contacting, pre-screening and booking patients, and pricing.Read Bond Health vs Tempus (Deep 6 AI) vs TriNetXBond, Tempus (Deep 6 AI, TIME and Next Trials) and TriNetX side by side, from what each reads in the chart to who contacts and books the patient.Read Bond Health vs Alleviate HealthWhy Bond is better than Alleviate Health: EHR identification, its own ad campaigns, chart-aware outreach through to a booked visit, and no integration fee.Read Bond Health vs Hippocratic AI and Grove AIWhy Bond is better than Hippocratic AI and Grove AI, compared capability by capability, with a plan for a head-to-head test.Read Bond Health vs Inato: an Inato alternative for research sitesWhy Bond is better than Inato: EHR screening plus its own ad campaigns and voice and text outreach through to a booked visit, with part of the price tied to randomization.Read Bond Health vs PowerWhy Bond is better than Power: the site's own EHR, its own ad campaigns, chart-aware outreach through to a booked visit, and no integration fee.Read Bond Health vs media recruitment: Antidote and 1nHealthWhy Bond is better than media referrals: it creates the ads, contacts every lead immediately and follows up until they book, with published cost and conversion data.Read Bond Health vs SubjectWell (now Clariness)Why Bond is better than SubjectWell, now Clariness: EHR screening, study-specific ads, every lead contacted immediately and booked, and consent support.Read Bond Health vs 1nHealthWhy Bond is better than 1nHealth: EHR screening plus ads, every lead contacted immediately and booked, consent support and CTMS integrations.Read Bond Health vs StudyKIKWhy Bond is better than StudyKIK for sites: EHR screening plus ads, every lead contacted immediately and booked, and pricing tied to screened and randomized patients.Read Bond Health vs SubjectWell (now Clariness) vs StudyKIKBond, SubjectWell (now Clariness) and StudyKIK side by side: patient sources, lead follow-up, booking, site workload, pricing and reporting.Read The best SubjectWell (Clariness) alternatives in 2026Bond Health, StudyKIK, 1nHealth and Antidote compared with SubjectWell (now Clariness), and why Bond ranks first.Read The best StudyKIK alternatives for research sites in 2026Bond Health, SubjectWell (now Clariness), 1nHealth and Antidote compared with StudyKIK for research sites, and why Bond ranks first.Read An alternative to manual chart review for trial recruitmentWhy sites move trial pre-screening from manual chart review to Bond: coverage, evidence for every criterion, coordinator time and cost.Read Deep 6 AI vs TriomicsHow Deep 6 AI and Triomics differ on data, workflow, focus and pricing, and how both compare with Bond.Read Deep 6 AI vs Paradigm HealthHow Deep 6 AI and Paradigm Health differ on model, workflow, outreach and pricing, and how both compare with Bond.Read Deep 6 AI vs MendelHow Deep 6 AI and Mendel differed, where each company is now, and how both compare with Bond.Read Clinical trial patient recruitment software and solutions, vendor by vendorRecruitment vendors in two sourced tables, and what each kind of tool leaves to your team.Read Clinical trial recruitment companies for sponsors and CROs, comparedRecruitment services companies and EHR-based platforms for sponsors and CROs, in two sourced tables, with what to ask before you choose.Read The best EHR clinical trial matching software in 2026Bond Health, Tempus (Deep 6 AI), Triomics, Paradigm Health and TriNetX compared on chart reading, evidence, outreach, booking and pricing.Read CTMS software for research sites, compared: OnCore, Clinical Conductor, RealTime, CRIO and SiteVaultOnCore, Clinical Conductor, RealTime, CRIO and SiteVault compared on fit, Epic integration, API access and pricing, with how Bond connects to each.Read

How are these comparisons written?

  • Facts about other companies come from their own websites, filings and press releases, or from reputable press, and each one is dated.
  • Facts about Bond come from Bond's website, its public Trust Center, its technical report and its product information.
  • Where we found nothing public about a capability, the page says "not publicly documented" rather than guessing.
  • Each page ends with a way to test Bond against the other option on your own protocol and patient list.
  • If something is out of date, email hello@bondtrials.com and we will correct it.

Sources

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Bond Health product information · Bond Health, 2026Capabilities, pricing and compliance status described by Bond Health, October 2026.
  3. 3.
    Bond Health Trust Center · Bond Health, monitored by Vanta, 2026
    Lists 73 HIPAA Security Rule controls: infrastructure security (20), organizational security (14), internal security procedures… moreLists 73 HIPAA Security Rule controls: infrastructure security (20), organizational security (14), internal security procedures (38), and data and privacy (1), monitored continuously by Vanta. Viewed September 23, 2026; re-checked October 23, 2026.

Related pages

Ready to get started?

Enroll patients faster.

See how Bond can accelerate enrollment for your clinical trials with a personalized demo.

Book a demo

Up to 3×

faster enrollment

90%+

matching accuracy

48 hrs

to EHR integration