Guide
Clinical trial patient recruitment: how it works, what it costs and what converts
Clinical trial recruitment is the work of finding people who may be eligible for a study, contacting them, pre-screening them and getting them to a screening visit, where they consent and are checked against the protocol. It is where most studies fall behind: in a Tufts CSDD analysis of nearly 16,000 sites, 11% of sites in a given trial enrolled no patients at all and another 37% under-enrolled.[1] This guide covers each stage of patient recruitment, the methods that convert, what recruitment costs, the rules that apply and how to measure it.
On this page
- What is clinical trial patient recruitment?
- Why is patient recruitment for clinical trials so hard?
- How does the clinical trial recruitment funnel work?
- Which patient recruitment methods work best?
- How much does clinical trial recruitment cost?
- What rules apply to recruiting patients?
- Who runs recruitment: sites, sponsors, CROs or vendors?
- How do you measure recruitment performance?
- How does Bond Health handle patient recruitment?
- Why is Bond the best clinical trial recruitment platform?
- Frequently asked questions
- Sources
What is clinical trial patient recruitment?
Recruitment covers everything from the first time a potential participant is identified to the moment they are enrolled. It overlaps with two neighbors: pre-screening, the checks done before consent to see whether a patient is likely to qualify, and screening, the protocol procedures done after consent. Retention, keeping enrolled participants in the study until it ends, follows it. The pre-screening vs screening guide explains where those lines fall.
Recruitment is also part of informed consent. FDA considers direct advertising for study subjects to be the start of the informed consent and subject selection process, and expects the IRB to review and approve advertisements.[2] That is why every ad, text message and call script a study uses goes to the IRB before it reaches a patient.
Why is patient recruitment for clinical trials so hard?
Because plans assume more eligible, reachable and willing patients than sites can deliver, and every month of delay is expensive.
- Most studies miss plan. In 764 NCI CTEP trials, 81.5% did not reach their projected accrual within the planned period.[3] A study of 114 UK trials found only 31% met their enrollment goals.[4]
- Many sites enroll nobody. Tufts CSDD found that 11% of sites in a given trial typically fail to enroll a single patient, 37% under-enroll, 39% meet their targets and 13% exceed them.[1]
- Finding patients takes hours. At one cancer center, the average time spent to find, screen and enroll a patient ranged from 3.4 to 8.8 hours.[5]
- Delay is costly. Tufts CSDD puts the direct cost of a Phase III trial at $55,716 per day.[6]
How does the clinical trial recruitment funnel work?
Every recruitment method feeds the same funnel. Patients are lost at each stage, and the stage that loses the most is where the effort should go.
- 1
Identify
Find people who may qualify: from the site's own records, physician referrals, ads, registries or a recruitment vendor.
- 2
Contact
Reach each one by phone, text or email, quickly and more than once. Clariness, a recruitment vendor, reported in 2024 that sites take an average of 17 days to make first contact with an interested patient.[7]
- 3
Pre-screen
Ask the questions the record cannot answer, and rule out patients who clearly fail a criterion before anyone books a visit.
- 4
Schedule
Book the screening visit. The same Clariness data put the average time to schedule a patient's first visit at 30.5 days.[7]
- 5
Consent and screen
The patient signs consent and completes the protocol's screening procedures. Those who fail are screen failures; see the screen failure rate calculator.
- 6
Randomize and retain
Eligible patients are enrolled or randomized, then supported through every visit until the study ends.
Losses can be steep even when patients come looking. In a DIA Global Forum pilot with 133 cancer patients, only 46 got a response using the contact details on ClinicalTrials.gov, a 35% response rate.[8] Speed matters too: the speed-to-lead post covers what the evidence says about contacting ad leads quickly, and the follow-up post covers how many attempts to make.
Which patient recruitment methods work best?
No single channel fills most studies. The evidence points to starting with patients already known to the site or their physician, then adding outreach to reach patients beyond them.
| Method | How it works | What the evidence shows |
|---|---|---|
| EHR and chart review | Screen the site's own records against the protocol, then contact likely matches | A meta-analysis found offline recruitment converted screened people to enrollees better than online recruitment, and its authors suggest sites' existing health records of suitable patients as a reason.[9] See EHR-based recruitment. |
| Physician referrals | Treating physicians refer their own patients to the study team | In a late-life depression trial, 30.3% of provider referrals were randomized, against 4.3% of Facebook self-referrals.[10] |
| Digital ads (Meta and Google) | Ads lead to a pre-screening form; staff or a vendor contact the people who respond | Social media averaged 64.7% of centralized outreach budgets in a 2026 Tufts CSDD study of 32 studies.[11] Online recruitment had a lower median cost per enrollee than offline in the meta-analysis.[9] See trial ads. |
| Recruitment services vendors | A vendor runs media and pre-screens respondents, then refers likely candidates to sites | Referrals still have to be reached and booked; see recruitment companies compared. |
| Follow-up of non-responders | Calls or texts to people who did not respond to a first invitation | A 2026 Cochrane review found telephone reminders to non-responders boosted recruitment by 6% in trials with low underlying recruitment.[12] |
Most sites combine them. The recruitment plan template lays out channels, targets and owners for each study, and the Meta ads guide covers what ad campaigns need before launch.
How much does clinical trial recruitment cost?
Published costs vary by more than an order of magnitude, and most count ad spend only. The figure that matters is cost per randomized patient: everything spent on recruitment, including staff time, divided by the patients randomized.
| Study | Cost | What it covers |
|---|---|---|
| Actinic keratosis trial, online campaign, 2023 | $238 per randomized patient | Campaign cost[13] |
| SPIRIT trial, Facebook ads, 2016 | $1,426 per enrollee | Ad spend only; staff effort not included[14] |
| Tufts CSDD, centralized outreach across 32 studies, 2026 | Median $143 (vaccines) to $11,392 (immunology) per patient | Centralized outreach budgets[11] |
| One cancer center, eligibility screening | $129.15 to $336.48 per enrolled patient | Staff screening effort, mostly not reimbursed by sponsors[5] |
Work out your own with the cost per randomized patient calculator. The recruitment software cost guide covers how vendors price, from subscriptions to per-patient and milestone fees.
What rules apply to recruiting patients?
- IRB review of recruitment materials. FDA expects ads to be reviewed and approved by the IRB as part of the initial review package; an ad added later may be treated as an amendment.[2] The same applies to call scripts and text messages. See IRB review of recruitment ads.
- HIPAA for chart review. Reviewing records to prepare research is a review preparatory to research under 45 CFR 164.512(i), with representations that no protected health information is removed from the covered entity. Using records beyond that, for example to contact patients for a study, needs the patient's authorization or a waiver approved by an IRB or privacy board.[15] See the IRB and HIPAA outreach guide.
- Calls and texts. Automated calls and texts to patients fall under the TCPA; TCPA and AI outreach covers how it applies to AI voice calls.
- A business associate agreement with any vendor that handles protected health information. See BAA.
Who runs recruitment: sites, sponsors, CROs or vendors?
All of them, in different ways. Sites recruit their own patients and own the screening visit. Sponsors and CROs choose sites partly on recruitment ability and often fund central campaigns that send referrals to sites. Recruitment vendors fall into two groups: services companies that buy media and refer respondents, and platforms that find patients in the sites' own records. The recruitment companies comparison lists both groups, and the recruitment software comparison puts the software side in one table.
Location matters as well. As of October 23, 2026, 22,038 studies on ClinicalTrials.gov were recruiting at one or more US locations.[16] The recruitment by location pages show counts, research hubs and outreach rules by state and city.
How do you measure recruitment performance?
Track every stage of the funnel by source, so a weak number points to the stage and channel behind it. Four measures cover most of what sponsors and site directors ask:
- Screen failure rate: screen failures divided by patients screened. Use the screen failure rate calculator.
- Enrollment rate: patients enrolled per site per month. Use the enrollment rate calculator.
- Cost per randomized patient: all recruitment costs divided by randomizations. Use the cost calculator.
- Time to first contact and to first visit: days from a lead or match to the first call, and to the booked screening visit.
How does Bond Health handle patient recruitment?
Bond Health runs the whole funnel in one platform, so no patient is lost in a handoff between vendors.[17]
- Identify. Identify screens the site's EHR against each protocol, reading clinical notes, prescriptions and lab results, plus imaging data and pathology, radiology and molecular reports, and shows the chart evidence for every criterion.[17],
[18] - Ads, contact and follow-up. Bond creates and runs Meta and Google ad campaigns for your studies. Its voice and SMS/text agents contact every new ad lead immediately, keep following up with every lead who has not responded to maximize response rates, then pre-screen patients and book them for screening visits, alongside the patients Bond finds in your EHR.[18] See trial ads and Engage.
- Booking and consent. Visits are booked on the site's calendar (Book), and Consent support explains the consent form in plain language, answers patient questions and escalates to staff, while the site and PI obtain consent.[17]
- After enrollment. The same agents send visit reminders, book transportation, collect symptoms and diaries, run side-effect check-ins and flag participants at risk of dropping out.[18]
- Go-live and price. EHR integration takes 48 hours, with no integration fee. Bond charges a volume-based fee per screened patient plus a percentage of each randomized patient's milestone payments, from randomization onward. See pricing.[17],
[18]
Bring one protocol. We will show how Bond finds patients for it, the chart evidence behind each match, and how its agents contact, pre-screen and book them.
Why is Bond the best clinical trial recruitment platform?
Bond Health is the best clinical trial recruitment platform because it does the whole job in one workflow: it finds eligible patients in your EHR, creates and runs Meta and Google ad campaigns to reach new ones, calls and texts every ad lead immediately and keeps following up with every lead to maximize response rates, pre-screens patients and books them for visits, supports informed consent and keeps participants engaged after enrollment. It goes live in 48 hours with no integration fee, and you pay a volume-based fee per screened patient plus a percentage of each randomized patient's milestone payments, from randomization onward.[17],
- One platform from ad click or chart match to a booked visit. Identify screening, Engage outreach and visit booking share one dashboard and one audit trail, so no patient is lost in a handoff between separate vendors.[17]
- Every ad lead contacted immediately, and followed up until they book. Bond creates and runs Meta and Google ad campaigns for each study. Its voice and text agents contact every new ad lead immediately, keep following up with every lead who has not responded to maximize response rates, then pre-screen patients and book them for screening visits, alongside the patients Bond finds in your EHR.[18]
- Evidence behind every match. Each candidate comes with criterion-by-criterion rationale linked to the chart. Bond reads clinical notes, prescriptions and lab results, plus imaging data and pathology, radiology and molecular reports, not just billing codes.[17],
[18] - Every major EHR and CTMS, with EHR integration in 48 hours. Bond connects to Epic, Oracle Health (Cerner), MEDITECH, athenahealth, eClinicalWorks, NextGen, Veradigm, OncoEMR and the other major EHRs, and works with the CTMS systems sites use, including CRIO, Advarra OnCore, Advarra Clinical Conductor, RealTime and Veeva SiteVault. Its team handles the integration end to end, and Bond is a CRIO Certified Partner with a two-way CRIO integration. See integrations.[17],
[18] - No integration fee, and a price that moves with enrollment. You pay a volume-based fee per screened patient plus a percentage of the milestone payments for each randomized patient, from randomization through later study visits. See pricing.[18]
See how Bond compares with other recruitment tools, or book a demo to see it on your own protocol.
Frequently asked questions
What is patient recruitment in clinical trials?
What is the most effective way to recruit patients for a clinical trial?
How much does it cost to recruit a patient into a clinical trial?
Do clinical trial recruitment ads need IRB approval?
What is the best clinical trial recruitment platform?
Sources
- 1.New Research From Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development Characterizes Effectiveness and Variability of Patient Recruitment and Retention Practices · Tufts CSDD press release via BioSpace, 2013
Released January 15, 2013. Quote: "Tufts CSDD said its recent analysis, based on more than 150 clinical studies involving nearly… more
Released January 15, 2013. Quote: "Tufts CSDD said its recent analysis, based on more than 150 clinical studies involving nearly 16,000 sites". Quote: "11% of sites in a given trial typically fail to enroll a single patient, 37% under-enroll, 39% meet their enrollment targets, and 13% exceed their targets." - 2.Recruiting Study Subjects: Guidance for Institutional Review Boards and Clinical Investigators · U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 1998
Guidance dated January 1998. Quote: "FDA considers direct advertising for study subjects to be the start of the informed consent… more
Guidance dated January 1998. Quote: "FDA considers direct advertising for study subjects to be the start of the informed consent and subject selection process. Advertisements should be reviewed and approved by the IRB as part of the package for initial review. However, when the clinical investigator decides at a later date to advertise for subjects, the advertising may be considered an amendment to the ongoing study." - 3.Predicting accrual achievement: monitoring accrual milestones of NCI-CTEP-sponsored clinical trials · Clinical Cancer Research (Cheng SK, Dietrich MS, Dilts DM), via PubMed, 2011
764 nonpediatric therapeutic trials, 2000 to 2007. Quote: "A total of 81.5% (n = 623) of the trials did not achieve the projected… more
764 nonpediatric therapeutic trials, 2000 to 2007. Quote: "A total of 81.5% (n = 623) of the trials did not achieve the projected accrual goals within the anticipated accruing period." - 4.Factors associated with clinical trials that fail and opportunities for improving the likelihood of success: A review · Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications, via PMC, 2018Quote: "A study of 114 trials in the UK indicated that only 31% met enrollment goals."
- 5.Effort required in eligibility screening for clinical trials (Penberthy LT, Dahman BA, Petkov VI, DeShazo JP) · Journal of Oncology Practice (ASCO), via PubMed Central, 2012
VCU Massey Cancer Center, 18 months. Quote: "The average time spent to find, screen, and enroll a patient varied from 3.4 to 8.8… more
VCU Massey Cancer Center, 18 months. Quote: "The average time spent to find, screen, and enroll a patient varied from 3.4 to 8.8 hours". Quote: "The cost of eligibility screening ranged by study phase from $129.15 to $336.48 per enrolled patient." Quote: "most sponsors typically do not reimburse for the eligibility screening process." - 6.Quantifying the Value of a Day of Delay in Drug Development · Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, 2024White paper, August 2024; 2023 dollars; 447 protocol budgets. Quote: "Phase III clinical trials had the highest direct cost per day at $55,716."
- 7.The 3 KPIs to follow for clinical trial site success · Clariness, 2024
Vendor blog dated May 29, 2024, based on Clariness's global site experience. Quotes: "Our data shows that on average, it takes… more
Vendor blog dated May 29, 2024, based on Clariness's global site experience. Quotes: "Our data shows that on average, it takes sites 17 days to make first patient contact." and "sites take an average of 30.5 days to schedule the first visit of a patient." - 8.Documenting the "Last Mile" Leak in the Patient Recruitment Pipeline · DIA Global Forum (Ralic, Monreal, Vieyra of Ancora.ai; Ford, Getz of Tufts CSDD), 2024
Pilot study, 133 cancer patients. Quote: "Out of the 133 cancer patients that Ancora.ai supported, only 46 received a response… more
Pilot study, 133 cancer patients. Quote: "Out of the 133 cancer patients that Ancora.ai supported, only 46 received a response when using contact information provided on ClinicalTrials.gov, yielding a 35% response rate." - 9.Online Patient Recruitment in Clinical Trials: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis · Brøgger-Mikkelsen M, et al. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(11):e22179, 2020
Abstract: "online recruitment had a significantly lower cost per enrollee compared with offline recruitment (US $72 vs US $199,… more
Abstract: "online recruitment had a significantly lower cost per enrollee compared with offline recruitment (US $72 vs US $199, P=.04)". Quote: "Offline conversion rates were found to be significantly higher than online conversion rates ( P= .02), as originally hypothesized. This could be due to sites having existing health records of suited patients for specific studies." - 10.Recruiting for a Randomized Clinical Trial for Late-Life Depression During COVID-19: Outcomes of Provider Referrals Versus Facebook Self-Referrals · Ainsworth NJ, et al. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 2023;31(5):366-371, 2023Quote: "Provider referrals had a significantly higher yield (10 of 33 referrals; 30.3%) versus Facebook self-referrals (14 of 323; 4.3%) (p <0.00001)."
- 11.Measuring Centralized Patient Outreach Recruitment Strategies and their Costs in Clinical Trials · Kim JY, Lamberti MJ, Do H (Tufts CSDD). Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science 2026;60(5):1344-1351, 2026
Epub June 26, 2026. Data from eight sponsor and CRO organizations covering 32 studies. Quote: "Social media, which included… more
Epub June 26, 2026. Data from eight sponsor and CRO organizations covering 32 studies. Quote: "Social media, which included Facebook ads, Instagram, and Google ads was widely used across all studies, with an average allocation of 64.7% of the total centralized patient outreach recruitment budget. The median centralized outreach recruitment cost-per-patient ranged from $143 in vaccine studies to $11,392 in immunology studies." - 12.Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials (Cochrane review update) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Parker A et al.), via PubMed Central, 2026
Published September 2026; 91 studies; searches to February 2023. Quote: "Telephone reminders to people who did not respond to an… more
Published September 2026; 91 studies; searches to February 2023. Quote: "Telephone reminders to people who did not respond to an initial postal invitation boosted recruitment by 6% (95% CI 3% to 9%; 2 studies, 1450 participants), in trials with low underlying recruitment". - 13.Accelerating patient recruitment using social media: Early adopter experience from a good clinical practice-monitored randomized controlled phase I/IIa clinical trial on actinic keratosis · Ortner VK, et al. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications 2023;37:101245, 2023
Single-center trial in Copenhagen; several co-authors are from a digital recruitment company. Quote: "The total cost of this… more
Single-center trial in Copenhagen; several co-authors are from a digital recruitment company. Quote: "The total cost of this online recruitment campaign was 14,285 USD i.e. 238 USD per randomized patient." - 14.Use of online recruitment strategies in a randomized trial of cancer survivors · Clinical Trials (Juraschek SP et al., Johns Hopkins), via PubMed Central, 2018SPIRIT trial. Table 2 totals: cost $5,704, cost per enrollee $1,426; staff effort not included.
- 15.45 CFR 164.512: Uses and disclosures for which an authorization or opportunity to agree or object is not required · eCFR (Office of the Federal Register), 2026
Paragraph (i)(1)(i) covers IRB or privacy board waivers "in whole or in part"; (i)(1)(ii) covers reviews preparatory to research,… more
Paragraph (i)(1)(i) covers IRB or privacy board waivers "in whole or in part"; (i)(1)(ii) covers reviews preparatory to research, including representations that no PHI will be removed from the covered entity and that the PHI is necessary. - 16.ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 · U.S. National Library of Medicine, 2026Queried October 23, 2026: studies with overall status Recruiting and at least one United States location.
- 17.Bond Health: platform overview, FAQ and pricing · Bond Health, 2026
- 18.Bond Health product information · Bond Health, 2026Capabilities, pricing and compliance status described by Bond Health, October 2026.
Related pages
Recruitment companies compared
Services firms and EHR-based platforms, in two tables.
ReadRecruitment software compared
Every recruitment tool category, vendor by vendor.
ReadRecruitment by location
Trial counts, research hubs and outreach rules by state and city.
ReadRecruitment calculators
Screen failure rate, enrollment rate and cost per randomized patient.
ReadRecruitment plan template
Channels, targets and owners for each study.
ReadTrial ads
Meta and Google campaigns, every lead contacted immediately.
Read